Italian Government’s Green Pass Sanctions: A Battle for Public Health or Dictatorship?
The recent sanctions imposed by the Italian government on non-green pass holders have sparked a heated debate, with supporters and detractors offering vastly differing perspectives. This article explores both stances and examines the underlying issues at play.
Support for Sanctions
Supporters of the green pass sanctions argue that the measures are necessary for public health. They contend that any individual who refuses to join the battle against the disease should be sanctioned. This perspective asserts that if individuals have rejected society, it is only fair that society rejects them.
Opposition to Sanctions
Those vehemently opposed to the sanctions view them as draconian and unjust. One argument is that these vaccines are highly ineffective, with limited efficacy lasting only 5–6 months. Furthermore, these vaccines are being forcefully pushed on people who have already recovered from the same virus, raising concerns about their safety and efficacy.
Legal and constitutional considerations also come into play, as opponents argue that the imposition of these measures contravenes the Italian Constitution, which stipulates that a sanitary treatment can only be made mandatory if it is the only viable treatment against a disease. This contention suggests that the push for vaccines is being prioritized over other effective measures.
Corruption and Media Control
The discourse among the critics extends to broader issues of corruption and media control. They claim that Italy is ruled by a group of crooks where economics has been poor for decades, and nepotism and cronyism are widespread. The media, said to be largely brainwashed and dictated by a few owners, is accused of pushing a narrative without credibility.
Furthermore, the critics point out that the population is intellectually lazy, conformist, and uncultured, much like during the Fascist era. They argue that people are so brainwashed that they believe in superstitious propaganda, much like the ‘plague spreaders’ of the 17th century. This is seen as evidence of a population that is highly susceptible to propaganda and misinformation.
Problems with Vaccines and Vaccination Campaigns
The effectiveness and reliability of vaccines are frequently questioned. Critics cite examples of experts who have stated rubbish things, even when their claims have been debunked by the scientific community abroad. They highlight that mass vaccination has not stopped transmission, as evidenced by research published in reputable scientific journals.
The detractors also point out the specific case of a local news agency failing to report on a new discovery of monoclonal antibodies capable of stopping all variants, but instead reporting on a false statement by Pfizer's chairman about the need for annual jabs. This underscores the issues with misinformation and lack of transparency in the media.
Political Backdrop in Italy
The political landscape in Italy is also a point of contention. Critics argue that the ruling government is deeply involved in a Masonic-controlled authoritarian regime, with puppet governments and questionable political alliances. The observation is made that the government is leaning towards foreign producers, incurring high costs for ineffective products.
Conclusion
While supporters of the Green Pass sanctions see them as a necessary measure for public health, critics view them as a gross violation of individual freedoms and a necessary step towards enslavement through terror and propaganda. The debate highlights the complex interplay of public health, personal freedoms, and political corruption.
The battle in Italy is not just about public health but also about people's trust in their government, the media, and the efficacy of medical interventions. As the debate continues, the hope is that other western countries will learn from this experience and resist similar forms of governmental control and manipulation.