Refugee Accommodation: Hotels or Elsewhere?

The current refugee crisis has sparked a global debate on the best methods of accommodating those seeking safety and asylum. While common perception might suggest that refugees are housed in luxurious hotels, the reality is far more complex and often brutal. This article explores the varied methods of refugee accommodation, focusing on the role of hotels and the broader implications of these practices.

The Crisis in Perspective

Refugees are often seen as unwanted or illegitimate, and in many cases, they are rightfully portrayed as victims of war and conflict. Yet, the manner in which they are treated—often evicted and ordered to leave or deported—highlights the stark inequalities and xenophobic attitudes that prevail in many parts of the world.

For instance, in Greece, thousands of refugees are facing eviction due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. The authorities have been forced to move nearly 1,000 refugees into hotels to mitigate the risk of contagion, but this temporary solution is far from ideal. These refugees are typically housed in abandoned or derelict buildings, where they face harsh living conditions and constant uncertainty.

Refugee Accommodation Policies in Sweden

In Sweden, the approach to refugee accommodation is equally complex. The government is not permitted to run its own shelters due to competition laws, meaning that refugee housing often falls into the hands of private sector actors, such as hotel owners. During offseason, when regular tourists are not patronizing hotels, owners see a potential business opportunity by renting out their properties to the authorities—offering accommodations to refugees can be financially beneficial.

Despite this, hotel conditions can be inadequate. While some migrants have access to basic amenities, others face substandard conditions. Expectations are low, with no service provided, and rooms might house 4-6 individuals, maximizing revenue. These conditions are far from what the public might perceive as a dignified living arrangement.

Moreover, xenophobic attitudes can lead to discrimination. Some hotels may refuse to accommodate refugees outright, leading to situations where they are treated unfairly or even violently by the authorities. Such incidents have been reported in countries like Hungary, where police brutality against refugees is a growing concern.

Alternatives to Hotel Shelters

While hotels can serve a temporary purpose, they are not always the most suitable form of accommodation for refugees. In Sweden, for a long time, refugees were housed in abandoned military barracks and mental hospitals. This system worked during a time when fewer refugees were reaching Sweden. However, the introduction of the Schengen Area meant that many refugees bypassed Greek borders and sought asylum in Sweden, overwhelming the system.

The Swedish government initially believed the influx would be temporary, so they considered renting hotels. However, the lack of hotels and depopulated areas in the country means that this is not a common practice. Instead, refugees are often accommodated in abandoned buildings and makeshift camps in rural areas, away from urban centers.

Conclusion

Refugee accommodation is a multifaceted issue that touches on the intricacies of policy, economics, and social attitudes. While hotels can offer a temporary solution, they are not ideal for long-term housing. The need for adequate and dignified accommodation remains a pressing concern, with policies varying widely between countries and regions.

Understanding the challenges faced by refugees requires a nuanced approach that considers the various factors at play. From xenophobia and economic considerations to the practical realities of providing shelter, the journey to finding sustainable solutions continues.