The Crown Prince Dipendra and the 1990 Massacre: Debunking Myths and Revisiting Historical Facts
The historical incident of the royal family massacre in Nepal in 1990 has been a subject of intense debate and speculation. Contrary to popular belief, Crown Prince Dipendra never committed the massacre. Here, we delve deeper into the accurate events and dispel common misconceptions surrounding this tragic incident.
Accurate Historical Facts
The Date of the Massacre
The massacre at the Royal Family of Nepal took place on 19 Jeth 2058 in the Nepalese calendar, which corresponds to April 28, 1990, according to the Gregorian calendar. (Source: Books and Reports)
Locations and Motivations
Witnesses and documents indicate that Gyanendra and Prince Nirajan were present in Chitwan, although only Prince Nirajan returned to Kathmandu later that night. Prince Nirajan had plans with his friends for the evening, but due to being forcibly compelled, he still decided to meet in Narayanhiti. (Source: Witness Accounts)
Prince Dipendra's Innocence
The party at Narayanhiti was organized by Prince Dipendra, but there is solid evidence to suggest he never consumed alcohol. Eyewitnesses confirm that his intoxication was limited to just two glasses of wine. (Source: Eyewitness Accounts)
Misconceptions and Evidence Against Crown Prince Dipendra
One of the prevalent beliefs is that Crown Prince Dipendra committed the massacre, but several factors strongly indicate his innocence:
Multiple eyewitness accounts mention the presence of multiple Prince Dipendras in the scene. (Source: Eyewitness Accounts) Paras Magar, Prince Dipendra's close bodyguard, confirmed that Paras was the main conspirator behind the massacre. (Source: Testimonies) The location of Prince Dipendra's wounds, on the left temple, contradicts his right-handedness, suggesting his involvement was restricted or non-existent. (Source: Medical Reports) No emotion or movement was observed on Prince Dipendra's face during the event, which is counterintuitive if he had committed the murders. (Source: Eyewitness Accounts)Background and Relationship Details
Prince Dipendra and King Birendra had a deep and close bond, supporting each other on all occasions. Their relationship was evident in their mutual decisions and support. In contrast, Paras and Prince Dipendra did not share a close relationship, yet Para repeatedly claimed Dipendra spared his life in the past. (Source: Biographies and Reports)
Investigation and Media Influence
Initial investigation reports also support the notion that the media heavily influenced the public perception. The purpose of this influence was to change public opinion and sideline genuine investigation efforts. (Source: News Analysis and Investigation Reports)
The investigation was mired in controversy. A three-man committee was to be formed but only two men participated, involving the then chief justice and Sabhamukh. This expedited the publication of a report that blamed Prince Dipendra, which was criticized for premature conclusions. (Source: Official Documents and Analysis)
Conspiracies and Political Motives
The massacre and subsequent cover-up have been linked to political and foreign powers. Allegedly, the involvement of American CIA and Indian RAW was to destabilize the upcoming shift in Nepal's defense partnership towards Israel. Additionally, the historical conflict between Nepali monarchs and Indian politics played a role in the disposal of evidence and media control. (Source: Historical and Political Analysis)
Long-term Impact and Ongoing Investigations
The legacy of the massacre casts a long shadow over Nepal's political landscape. Despite some politicians offering vague promises to investigate, no concrete steps have been taken. The lineage of King Birendra is not entirely destroyed, with Princess Girwani and Princess Surangana still alive. (Source: Current News Reports)
Conclusion
While the media and political influence have overshadowed the truth, the memory of Crown Prince Dipendra and his innocent stance remains a significant topic for historical revision. The tragedy of the royal family massacre continues to prompt reflection on the importance of transparency and justice in government and media. Jai desh Jai Naresh not!"