The Mystery of Under-Earth Stations: Are There Any Without Exits?

Have you ever wondered if there are any underground metro stations that lack exits? While it might seem like an odd query, there are indeed a few examples around the world where certain metro stations have no public access. This article will explore some of the rare cases of underground stations that have no exits, discussing their purpose and the implications of such design choices.

Introduction to Exits-less Metro Stations

The concept of a station without exits is unconventional and uncommon, but it is not entirely unheard of. In many metro systems around the world, there are specific stations that are designed with no public exits, often due to their intended purpose or historical reasons. These stations are sometimes called ‘closed stations’.

Why Would a Metro Station Lack Exits?

The idea of a station without exits may sound both intriguing and strange. However, there are practical reasons why such stations exist. These stations are often used for maintenance, storage, or stock transfer purposes only, rather than being part of the regular service network. In these cases, the station is not intended for public use and therefore, no public exits are built.

Cases Studies: Underground Stations Without Exits

Let’s take a closer look at a couple of examples from Paris and New York.

Paris Metro

In the Paris Metro, one such station is Porte des Lilas – Cinéma. This station, though equipped with platforms and tracks, does not have any public exits. It is designed for storage, maintenance, and stock transfer purposes. Another example is on the connecting spurs between lines 3bis and 7bis at Haxo and on the spurs between lines 9 and 10 at Murat/Porte Molitor. These stations are not part of the regular passenger service, and their lack of external access is a result of being used only for storage.

New York City Subway

Similarly, in New York City, there are abandoned stations that no longer serve the public. These stations, while operational in the past, have since been shut down and lack public exits. Some of these stations might have been decommissioned for various reasons, such as improvements in the subway system or changes in passenger patterns.

Implications and Criticisms

The concept of a station without exits can certainly raise questions. Is it wise to have such stations? Are they a waste of infrastructure? While there are valid arguments for their existence in certain contexts, the practicality and necessity of such stations are often subject to debate.

Public Safety and Accessibility

From a public safety and accessibility point of view, every enclosed space, including metro stations, requires proper entries and exits. This is not just a matter of convenience but a fundamental safety requirement. Stations without exits would make it extremely difficult for passengers to enter or exit in case of emergencies, which is why most underground stations typically have multiple exits for safety reasons.

Historical and Artistic Considerations

There are, however, instances where the lack of exits is part of a design or artistic vision. For example, some stations might be designed as part of a larger artistic installation or as a standing monument that is not meant for daily use. In such cases, the purpose is clearly documented, and the public is generally aware of the station’s function.

Conclusion

The existence of underground stations without exits is rare and unconventional. While such stations may serve specific functional purposes, they often raise questions about design, practicality, and public safety. The idea of a station without any way in or out is so strange that it practically demands an explanation, making such stations intriguing topics for discussion and exploration.

Keywords:

Underground stations, metro exits, abandoned stations