Why Are the Majority of Americans So Against Removing Their Right to Bear Arms?

Amidst ongoing debates surrounding the right to bear arms, particularly in the United States, the belief that this right is divinely given remains a deeply ingrained stance for many Americans. This fundamental belief is greatly influenced by the principles enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, which famously asserts that 'all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,' among which are 'Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.' The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is seen as a tangible guarantee of these rights, specifically stating that 'the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.'

Historical Context and the Power of the Second Amendment

The idea that the right to bear arms is crucial for the preservation of life and liberty is often supported by a historical perspective. Throughout history, numerous examples have demonstrated that the suppression of this right can have catastrophic consequences. History attests to the fact that dictators and tyrants such as Hitler, Stalin, and Mao have disarmed their populations to maintain control, leading to the deaths of tens to hundreds of millions of people. The loss of freedom, as exemplified by the atrocities committed under these regimes, is often cited as a compelling argument for the preservation of the right to bear arms.

From a practical standpoint, the role of citizens armed with weapons in deterring criminal activity is often highlighted. In several instances, armed citizens have played a critical role in preventing or stopping violent crimes. For instance, on July 17, 2022, in a mall in Indiana, a 22-year-old citizen was able to shoot and kill a man who had entered with a rifle and opened fire in a food court, killing three and wounding two, including a 12-year-old girl. Similarly, in Estero, Florida, on November 14, 2016, an armed citizen intervened, killing a suspect who was attacking a law enforcement officer during a high-speed car chase. These examples illustrate the potential effectiveness of armed citizens in protecting life and liberty.

Understanding Rights and Governmental Recognition

A critical point in these debates is the concept of rights as divinely given versus those granted by the government. Rights, such as the right to bear arms, are seen as inherent to human existence and not subject to total abolition. They exist as natural aspects of humanity, inherent in every individual regardless of government recognition. A right, therefore, cannot be abolished; it can only be suppressed or criminalized.

The government's role is primarily to recognize, protect, and uphold these rights, rather than to grant them. When the Second Amendment is infringed upon, it is not the right that is abolished but the exercise of that right. The government may pass laws to regulate the possession and use of firearms, but these regulations can be seen as violations of core constitutional rights. For many, the infringement of these rights is a serious breach of their fundamental freedoms.

Conclusion

The right to bear arms is a deeply held belief among many Americans, which is seen as a divinely given, unalienable right. It is grounded in historical precedent, practical examples, and the fundamental tenets of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. Understanding the historical context and the essence of these rights helps in appreciating the importance of preserving this fundamental freedom for the protection and preservation of life and liberty.