Why Did the Poorer Regions of England Vote for Brexit?

The decision to vote in favor of Brexit during the 2016 referendum was complex, reflecting the socio-economic realities and challenges faced by various regions in England. Many voters in poorer regions like Cornwall, for instance, have expressed a significant sense of frustration and disillusionment with the European Union’s economic policies and the impact they have had on local communities.

The Role of Economic Mismanagement

The poorer regions of England, including Cornwall, have become particularly disenfranchised due to the perceived economic mismanagement by the EU. Critics argue that the Union's policies have not effectively addressed the core issues faced by these regions, such as low economic growth, lack of job opportunities, and high housing costs.

Objective 1 Funding and Its Impact

While some argue that the European Union (EU) has brought benefits, such as Objective 1 funding, the tangible improvements are often questioned. Objective 1 is a program designed to reduce the economic and social disparities across the EU by investing in less developed regions. In the case of Cornwall, it is claimed that the funds have not significantly transformed the local economy in the ways many hoped.

For example, despite these funds, Cornwall has remained one of the poorest counties in the UK. The influx of money has not led to substantial changes in terms of creating new industries or improving living standards comprehensively. Instead, some infrastructure projects, such as new roads and roadsides, have been pointed out as the extent of EU investment that has benefitted the area.

The Reality from a Local Perspective

Michael Price, a local resident of Cornwall, provides a poignant and realistic perspective. He questions the improvements brought about by EU funding, noting:

"For Cornwall, there seems to have been very little done by the E.U with Objective 1 money that is relevant to the actual people who live here."

Michael points out that while some projects like the Eden Project have seen improvements, the core issue of economic stagnation persists. The construction of a new industrial estate, though not directly connected to the EU, has seen a resurgence in units being built, suggesting a local economic revival rather than an external influence.

Perceived Economic Challenges

The local economy has been grappling with several challenges:

Rise in Housing Costs: The price of housing in Cornwall has increased, making it unaffordable for many local residents. Job Market: The farm labor jobs that were once available have been replaced by cheaper labor from the EU, leading to job insecurity. Social Pressures: Population growth due to deals with other authorities has put additional strain on local services and infrastructure.

These factors contribute to a sense of economic stagnation and frustration among the local population, who see little improvement despite prolonged EU engagement.

Perception and Reality

There is often a perception that people from poorer regions who voted for Brexit are either racist or ignorant. However, many argue that their perspective is rooted in pragmatic considerations rather than emotional binaries.

Intelligence and Discrimination: Michael Price asserts that these voters are perhaps the most intelligent, as they have witnessed and experienced the failure of EU projects. Despite being labeled as unintelligent or racist, they recognize the need for alternative approaches to improving their lives.

They see Brexit as an opportunity to voice their concerns and challenge the status quo. By voting for Brexit, they hoped to initiate a process that would lead to genuine improvements in their socio-economic conditions.

Conclusion

The poorer regions of England, particularly Cornwall, have faced significant economic and social challenges in the wake of EU engagement. The failure of EU policies to address these issues effectively has led to skepticism and a desire for change. Voting for Brexit was not simply a knee-jerk reaction but a reflection of the deep-seated dissatisfaction with the status quo. By addressing these underlying issues, policymakers can work towards building a more inclusive and prosperous future for all regions.

Welcome your comments and feedback on this discussion of how poorer regions in England voted for Brexit.