Why Benjamin Netanyahu’s Invasion of Rafah Despite Joe Biden's Warnings

Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to proceed with the invasion of Rafah, despite Joe Biden's stern warnings, stems from a complex mixture of political and strategic considerations. Primarily, Netanyahu fears the political consequences of backing down might result in a significant loss of support among a significant portion of his electorate, particularly within the Muslim community. However, the broader strategic context includes the necessity to eliminate the threat posed by Hamas, which is recognized not only as a terrorist organization but also as an extension of a larger "octopus" of terror groups.

Background and Context

The situation in Gaza, under Israeli blockade, has dire humanitarian consequences. With the refusal to allow medical supplies, food, and water into the territory, thousands of civilians have been displaced or have succumbed to starvation. According to reports, more than 36,000 civilians have been killed, and the threat from Hamas remains a constant concern.

Israel’s Objectives and Strategic Necessity

Netanyahu believes that the complete destruction of Hamas is essential for Israel’s security. Hamas is not just a domestic threat but a part of a network of terror groups that pose a global menace. From the Palestinian territories to Western Europe and even Germany post-World War II, these links make it imperative to deal with Hamas comprehensively.

Comparing Netanyahu and Biden’s Approaches

Biden’s approach, while well-intentioned, is not seen as effective in addressing the underlying issues. By continuing to supply Israel with weapon and funding despite human rights violations, Biden’s policy is criticized for not resolving the root causes of the conflict. The United States’ support has been a double-edged sword, providing Israel with the resources it needs but also drawing global condemnation.

Geopolitical Implications and Domestic Pressure

The geopolitical landscape further complicates the situation. Biden’s warnings are seen as both a strategic blunder and a political move to appease domestic left-wing elements, including the anti-American sentiment among certain groups. The recent events in the United States, such as the rampaging gangs and the divisiveness within the Democratic Party, reflect the growing rifts between political stances and national interests.

Conclusion: The Future of Palestinian Territories and Beyond

For the Palestinian territories to thrive and for their populations to have the possibility of statehood, the immediate objective must be to eliminate the genocidal threat posed by Hamas. Only by destroying Hamas's remnants and Hamas-supporting infrastructure can a new era of stability and prosperity be established. This is a call for a comprehensive approach from all parties involved, including the international community, to ensure that justice and security prevail in the region.